Thursday, April 5, 2007

Why Is Jihad Winning? How Can We Avoid Defeat?

Uncle Ayman responds:

These questions come to me via email from another Huffington Post user, who apparently wishes to remain nameless (sent as "Anonymous"). My standard policy is one question per inquirer, but in this case, I'll make an exception.

Well, "Anonymous," I'm happy to answer the first question; the second, for obvious reasons, I will only address theoretically.



(1) Why Is Jihad Winning?


As much as I hate to admit it, one of your fellow (former) Huffington Post users provided great insight into this question. That bastard infidel pig "JonQuixote" wrote on his pathetically satirical blog thread (here) of his claim that he "accidently" received a secret email from DNC Chairman Howard Dean, regarding his (Dean's) consideration of running a Mahmoud Ahmadinejad - Hugo Chavez ticket for the 2008 Presidential race (see bottom of that thread):
"The simple fact is that while the Islamists fervently believe in their cause, we don't believe in ours. We don't even know what our cause is. We are, to the rest of the world, a bunch of self-absorbed, spoiled, schizophrenic mumblers, who have no right to take any action except those that the "world community" approves of, and participates in.

"We accept guilt for what we have not done --- but readily assign it to anyone who dares to state that on whole, we have nothing to feel guilty about, or that to the contrary, America has saved, preserved and/or lengthened more lives than any nation in history, and advanced the cause of liberty and happiness to a degree that no other nation can match.

"And yet, we are tearing ourselves apart over whether we should, in the name of security, search nervous 24-year-old Muslim males or 78-year-old Caucasian grandmothers in wheelchairs prior to boarding airplanes --- and how we can have one government-controlled school system that can simultaneously cater to every possible philosophical, political and religious ideology --- including our new Islamist guests, residents and citizens.

"Clearly, as we no longer have a philosophical backbone, it is only a matter of time before the Islamists advance to a dominant role in our society. Why be so unpragmatic as to continue fighting!?!? Let's be PROactive and ease the transition... it will be better for EVERYONE in the long run --- and America will once again be a nation of principles (but let's not engage in any more nasty debates over which 'principles' are; some are better than none!)."
So, you see, absolute belief in one's principles is essential - whether those principles are rational or irrational. And as JonQ (atheistic bastard) noted, that the supreme infidel witch Ayn Rand said:
"[On three of the rules governing the mechanics of compromise] 1. In any conflict between two men (or two groups) who hold the same basic principles, it is the more consistent one who wins. 2. In any collaboration between two men (or two groups) who hold different basic principles, it is the more evil or irrational one who wins. 3. When opposite basic principles are clearly and openly defined, it works to the advantage of the rational side; when they are not clearly defined, but are hidden or evaded, it works to the advantage of the irrational side."
- "The Anatomy of Compromise," Capitalism: The Unknown Ideal
Can you not see that jihad is not winning, so much as the West (in general) and America (in particular) are losing --- by default?

But hey, a victory is a victory, right? Who cares how we got there!!!

In summary, to use an analogy, it's like America is running a fruit stand and has absolutely no protection against roaming hoodlums who run up and steal bananas, apples, etc.; they're there for the taking.

And once ordinary people see that the stand owner has no respect for himself, and allows his fruit is being taken at will, at some point, they will start to take fruit too --- because that's the message that has been sent.

Eventually, the fruit stand will cease to exist, because its "business model" is unsustainable. This paradigm is, as you see, applicable to nations, as well.

Are you starting to see the answer to your question, now? If not, consider this: The Democratic leaders on Capitol Hill have now actually banned the term "Global War on Terror" from America's defense appropriations bills, and as we've observed before, they won't even use the term "jhad," or identify America's enemy as militant Islamist fundamentalists.

You ask how we are winning? I ask, how can we not win, in an environment in which our opponents don't even have the courage to identify the enemy that has declared war on them?



(2) How Can We Avoid Defeat?

Coming soon.





.

Wednesday, April 4, 2007

Why Do You Say The Leftists Love Terrorists?

Actually, this question was phrased as follows, by "Thalia" at The Huffington Post, here:

Stick to simple things, like how libs love terrorists, that stuff. okay?
By: Thalia on April 02, 2007 at 10:53am


Uncle Ayman responds:

Oh, Thalia, you poor, poor thing. The unhinged rage in your brain prevents you from seeing the truth.

I have never said that. Not once. Is this why you've been nicknamed "Thaliar"?


("Liberals" = real liberals; standing for individual freedom, small, transparent government, low taxation, a strong military, economic freedom, etc.)

("Leftists" = rabid leftists, a la you, CodePink, NotInOurName, IntlANSWER, UnitedForPeace&Justice, MoveOn, DailyKos, etc. etc. etc.)


Leftists hate Bush. Jihadists do too.

Leftists hate economic freedom. Jihadists do too.

Leftists want a central authority to have legal control over education. Jihadists do too.

Leftists want all media & communications regulated by a central authority. Jihadists do too.

Leftists want to de-fund America's military-industrial complex. Jihadists do too.

Leftists believe there should have been no widespread military response to combat global jihad, and all those who fund and enable it after 9/11. Jihadists do too.

Leftists believe that America in its present state ("imperialist aggressor") is the greatest threat to world stability. Jihadists do too.



So, you see, even though you may not "love terrorists," by having so many common views, leftists like you are, by definition, aiding jihadists, whether you accept that or not.

Truth is hard to swallow, sometimes, grasshopper.

Something else for you to keep in mind:

The American left could have merely said, “We disagree with President Bush’s actions in this regard, and here’s why.” And made a cohesive, logical argument against his actions and policies (most of which your Democratic leaders also supported, from the invasion of Iraq and Afghanistan to the PATRIOT Act, to innumerable other examples, which they now disavow, and your MSM refuses to hold them to account for).

(Steve Martin voice): But NOOOOOOOoooooooooooooo.... Instead, praise Allah, peace be upon Him, you initiated a boatload of conspiracy theories, likening him to Satan (which jihadists taught you), claiming that he only invaded Iraq to enrich himself and his oil industry friends (which you came up with all by yourselves), that he is intent on becoming a dictator, etc.

In short, you went light-years further than even al Quada did to discredit him, and hamstring his every effort to combat jihadists, in Afghanistan, Iraq and elsewhere.

The blindness and dhimmitude of leftists like you was wonderfully expressed by your reaction to your new Speaker of the House, Mrs. Pelosi, when, in the leadup to the 2006 elections, she said that the only reason al Quada is in Iraq is because your soldiers are there – and that when they leave, al Quada will also leave. This was the final triumph, the final note of the colossal ignorance (willful or not) that America has been reduced to. So when you see the carnage that we are bringing to Iraq, keep that statement in mind – along with your media’s abject refusal to explain to you all the facts that I’ve presented in this response to your questions.

Thaliar, you and the jihadists can both look forward to a day when this will all be explained to your citizens via the only TV channel that will be permitted in America – "The Sharia Channel." And America’s surrender of Iraq to al Quada, which is now imminent, thanks to you and your fellow leftists, has brought jihadists one day closer to that eventuality. Again, praise Allah, peace be upon Him…. THANK YOU.

Yours,
Uncle Ayman

PS (07April): It has come to my attention that that infidel pig bastard JonQuixote has again astutely documented some of the seething rants of those helpful America leftist dhimmis, here.



Original content is © Copyright 2007 by AskUncleAyman.blogspot.com. All rights reserved.

Send your questions to UncleAyman1@gmail.com


.

Why Is America's Educational System Dominated By Leftists?

(This question was posted by "djthedj" on the Huffington Post, here, at 10:17am)


Uncle Ayman responds:

That's a good question.

I simply don't know.

I do know that at the turn of the 19th century, socialists and communists were hellbent on progressively wiping out the concept of freedom, of individual rights, of property rights, and to enshrine the government (state) with progressively more power - including over every youngster's mind.

This is beyond dispute. This is all historical fact. And it is also beyond dispute that they took their cue from Europe and Asia - because neither of the monsters they created could have garnered the popular support they did unless the state had absolute control over education (and communications, etc.).

As to why leftists comprise 90%+ of the American government-dominated educational establishment today, I think a good part of it is in the hiring process.

They hire their kind - and ostracize anyone who thinks differently. Just look at the "speech codes," at the textbooks, at the surveys of teachers and professors.

And for all this, jihadists are eminently grateful.

Because today, to organize a rally on a college or high school campus to denounce Jews and Israelis as "Nazis" and "racists" is ho-hum (image at right from Wayne State University); but to try to do that to denounce jihadists, or those who support or enable them (us), well, you better have very deep pockets to fund not only a legion of attorneys, but also, to provide security.


In short, we could not be happier with the state of your government-dominated educational system. Being that most of it is already centrally-controlled (as it is, it must be, in socialist and communist and fascist nations), the transition to our sharia dictates will be far less difficult and painful than were it based on freedom, on free choice, and not on compulsion.

I hope that answers your question - and then some.

Yours,
Uncle Ayman






Original content is © Copyright 2007 by AskUncleAyman.blogspot.com. All rights reserved.

Send your questions to UncleAyman1@gmail.com


.